Vlákno názorů k článku Úspěšný útok na Internet - I ? od Pavel Kolesnikov - BTW myslenku utoku "velkym zavirovanim" rozvadi zname kvitko...

  • Článek je starý, nové názory již nelze přidávat.
  • 13. 12. 2002 13:47

    Pavel Kolesnikov (neregistrovaný)
    BTW myslenku utoku "velkym zavirovanim" rozvadi zname kvitko Zalewski ve svem povidani o WormNetu (viz google: wormnet zalewski) publikovanem v dobe medialniho humbuku kolem viru jako ILoveYou.
  • 13. 12. 2002 14:06

    Pavel Kolesnikov (neregistrovaný)
    Predpokladam, ze jsi to cetl :-)

    Nepsal, ze by chtel utocit, ale je zjevne, ze to chtel umoznit.

    Zjednodusene receno, vytycil zakladni cile wormnetu (cituji):

    1: Portability - worm must be architecture-independent, and should work on different operating systems (in fact, we focused on Unix/Unix-alikes, but developed even DOS/Win code).

    2: Invisibility - worm must implement stealth/masquerading techniques to hide itself in live system and stay undetected as long as it's possible.

    3: Independence - worm must be able to spread autonomically, with no user interaction, using built-in exploit database.

    4: Learning - worm should be able to learn new exploits and techniques instantly; by launching one instance of updated worm, all other worms, using special communication channels (wormnet), should download updated version.

    5: Integrity - single worms and wormnet structure should be really difficult to trace and modify/intrude/kill (encryption, signing).

    6: Polymorphism - worm should be fully polymorphic, with no constant portion of (specific) code, to avoid detection.

    7: Usability - worm should be able to realize choosen mission objectives - eg. infect choosen system, then download instructions, and, when mission is completed, simply disappear from all systems.

    A z bodu "learning" a "usability" mi moznost takovehoto utoku pomerne jasne vyplyva.

    Ale dale jsem to nesledoval, takze nebudu spekulovat, nakolik to byla jen teoreticka studia ci mirne rozpracovany projekt, a nakolik se to da vnimat tak, ze se MZ chysta "znicit Internet" :-)

  • 13. 12. 2002 14:08

    Pavel Kolesnikov (neregistrovaný)
    jeste jednou a lepe:

    Predpokladam, ze jsi to cetl :-)

    Nepsal, ze by chtel utocit, ale je zjevne, ze to chtel umoznit.

    Zjednodusene receno, vytycil zakladni cile wormnetu (cituji):

    1: Portability - worm must be architecture-independent, and should work on different operating systems (in fact, we focused on Unix/Unix-alikes, but developed even DOS/Win code).

    2: Invisibility - worm must implement stealth/masquerading techniques to hide itself in live system and stay undetected as long as it's possible.

    3: Independence - worm must be able to spread autonomically, with no user interaction, using built-in exploit database.

    4: Learning - worm should be able to learn new exploits and techniques instantly; by launching one instance of updated worm, all other worms, using special communication channels (wormnet), should download updated version.

    5: Integrity - single worms and wormnet structure should be really difficult to trace and modify/intrude/kill (encryption, signing).

    6: Polymorphism - worm should be fully polymorphic, with no constant portion of (specific) code, to avoid detection.

    7: Usability - worm should be able to realize choosen mission objectives - eg. infect choosen system, then download instructions, and, when mission is completed, simply disappear from all systems.

    A z bodu "learning" a "usability" mi moznost takovehoto utoku pomerne jasne vyplyva.

    Ale dale jsem to nesledoval, takze nebudu spekulovat, nakolik to byla jen teoreticka studia ci mirne rozpracovany projekt, a nakolik se to da vnimat tak, ze se MZ chysta "znicit Internet" :-)

Upozorníme vás na články, které by vám neměly uniknout (maximálně 2x týdně).